While reading the comments below a story on the CBC website regarding location disputes for a methadone clinic, I could barely contain my laughter. The majority of commenters seem to have the idea in their head that a methadone clinic is the same thing as a safe-injection site and some even went so far as to label such clinics drug dealers. Honestly!
So what is the fuss? The Second Chance Recovery clinic was located downtown for six years before moving to a light industrial park on 41 Ave. N.E. a few months ago when its lease was up. However, the City is now requiring the clinic to move once again due to zoning restrictions. The clinic treats people trying to overcome opiate addictions, including heroin. Bill Leslie, who runs the clinic, told CTV reporters that the clinic serves approximately 500 people from all walks of life. Calgary has only one other methadone clinic, which is run by the Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission and has a three-month waiting list. Obviously, there is a need for this second clinic to remain operational. The only problem is finding a location for it.
There has been talk of the clinic moving to Forest Lawn, but this has sparked sharp backlash from the community association, as has been the case with any community suggested as a possible location. Apparently, community members believe people who use the clinic are unsavoury types who they would prefer to keep out of their backyards and away from their children. There is fear that the recovering addicts (seen only as "addicts" or "druggies" by community members) will increase crime in the community and attract drug dealers and other criminals. This simply is not so.
Anyone who is using the clinic is doing so out of a desire to change their lives, to turn them around and make something positive of themselves. Why else would they seek such help?
"Next time you come to your car and some druggie has smashed a window for the change that fell out of your pocket you can think about how warm and comfy they are shooting up in drug treatment strategy," wrote one of the commenters below the CBC story. It is these kinds of misconceptions that make people want to avoid utilizing the services offered by recovery clinics such as Second Chance. The stigma of having to admit to addiction and being subsequently and mistakenly labelled as a threat to safety and security is not helpful, nor is the misperception of methadone clinics as "drug pushers."
Community members in Forest Lawn say that their neighbourhood is already stricken with enough crime, drugs and violence and this is the reason for not wanting a clinic whose mandate is to treat those unsavoury types. Do these people not realize that the point of this clinic is to decrease drug addiction in the city? If addicts already congregate in certain areas, does it not make sense to locate a clinic there? The point is, those making use of the clinic's services are not going to be smashing windows on their way to and from the clinic to find change for their next fix. They are going to the clinic to get their "fix" of methadone in an uphill battle to break the bonds of their addiction. They are not there to abduct children, vandalize property, steal or harm anyone. They are there to give themselves a second chance. So let's let them get on with it already.







Comments
I mean that sincerely. And you are correct, there is usually no more crime near a drug treatment clinic than any other place, and definitely there is not any crime occuring from MMT patients looking for a "fix" or "money for their methadone".....we either pay for it because we are now able to work, thanks to the methadone , or in some cases, are treatment is subsidized. We have no need to commit crime once stable on the methadone. That is the biggest fact the organized groups against methadone will twist around. They try to convince everyone that we are feeling "dopesick" each morning and are lurking around, desperately looking for money for a fix.
That is simply untrue and in fact, completely the opposite of the truth.
Methadone is very long acting and very stable medicine when used to prevent opiate cravings. We do not wake up sick. We do not drive impaired. We function, raise families, and work , just like anyone else. So it is very much appreciated to hear someone speak of "us" in a dignified way.
Thank you and God bless you.
Mothers Against Medical Abuse.Org
"You can tell who are the user's here."
Is that so? That's quite the ignorant assumption you got goin' on there...
From your website:
"MAMA.ORG has a ZERO TOLERANCE for the use of this drug!! It does not matter how a victim consumed this drug, it is killing thousands yearly. "
Well, so it tobacco (45,000 per year in Canada, according to the graph on the front of my package). Though it's pretty difficult in any capacity to argue that methadone is a benign drug, I would be quite interested in statistics re: non-methadone drug overdose and addiction rates were your "ZERO TOLERANCE" ideal to come to fruition.
"Methadone substitution is NOT the answer to addiction, it may be the answer for the addict to continue feeding their cravings and having a source that they can go to everyday but they are still using whether it is legal or not."
Please back this statement up with any credible scientific medical literature. kthxbai.
supporters tend to offer. Actually when our research began we had an open mind to clinical use for addiction but it did not take long to uncover the negligent and abusive behavior from both the user and the facility. User's are in a fantasy world to even think that Methadone consumed for years is being in treatment, that is ludicrous and the majority are no longer buying this BS, sorry but it is true. The credibility of the Pro-Methadone advocate is losing it's worth and trust. Slowly they have dug their own hole that is caving in as I write. As far as the ZERO TOLERANCE that comes from two years of scientific studies to include many sources, even autopsy reports. Your ignorance is limited to your knowledge which apparently has a short span of thought. You have a closed mind to learn anything except what you choose to learn. BREAKING NEWS, Methadone is not the WONDER drug and has become a tremendous thorn in the battle of addiction in this country.
Mothers Against Medical Abuse. Org
The churches at least base their dogma in scriptures that can be peer reviewed.
"please feel confident I have done my homework, personally and not by just looking up some crap on the internet as the pro-supporters tend to offer."
So... "Research" has now become "crap"? Interesting, how discussions can devolve. Please, clarify the extent of this "homework".
Also, I reissue my original challenge:
"Please back this statement up with any credible scientific medical literature. kthxbai."
-∆.
A Changing Landscape
The misguided attack on diversion deaths from Methadone Maintenance Treatment for addiction is changing.
There has been an ongoing attack focused strongly on Methadone Medically Assisted Treatment. This has been coming from people who have lost loved ones due to an overdose of methadone usually along with other medications.
As the use of methadone for pain has greatly increased due to itsà very low cost and effectiveness some important facts slowly came into view.
Six factors contributed to the rise in deaths involving methadone for pain:
1) The failure to bring some patients slowly and safely up to their needed dose.
2) The pain patients taking too much medication against their prescription.
3) The sale or gifting of methadone by pain patients and itsà subsequent abuse.
4) The advent of the pain drug mills increasing the availability of methadone.
5) The deadly combination of other drugs such as alcohol and benzodiazepines.
6) The need for increasing public awareness of the way methadone works.
Others sources include the theft of methadone from patients, clinics, pharmacies and drug shipments.
As the number of overdoses and deaths became increasingly evident to the government, the Methadone label was changed and the directions for prescribing Methadone for pain have been evolving.
Slow upward titration following signs and symptoms of potential overdose is important in preventing pain patient deaths. Methadone clinics have known about this and have practiced this for many years.
Pain patients need to keep their medication safe from theft and potential child use. A medicine cabinet filled with any kind of opiate pain medication is a target if any addict finds himself as a guest and uses the bathroom. If the pain is temporary, it is often left in the cabinet instead of properly disposing of the remaining tablets. A pharmacy could include a note about returning unused medications for disposal.
Thus, by comparing the incidents of problems in medically assisted treatment methadone clinics before the advent of the Methadone for Pain bulge, and after the advent, one might deductively assume that most of the problems with overdoses were far greater from the Methadone for pain side than from the Methadone for addiction maintenance programs.
During this time, those who have lost loved ones have been learning that methadone for addiction works and have significantly lessened their heavy emphasis towards Methadone Medically Assisted Treatment and the government has made changes and warnings that hopefully will reduce the deaths due to pain medication prescribing.
These groups who lost loved ones have increased the public awareness of the dangers of methadone when taken improperly. More action is needed to reach those who may abuse methadone. Such work may be aided by more patient and clinic involvement in local public relations.
You claim:
Not all innocent victims of methadone use are the same, so stop blaming all of them for their own victimization.
Yet you also claim:
All methadone clinics are the same, so please blame them for a long list of practices generating victims.
On what basis do you simultaneously claim support from two extremist but contradictory premises?
As #7 has requested, I'm sure you can explain and substantiate your argument with something other than presumed moral superiority.