They say a picture is worth a thousand words, the photo I ran in last week's paper is no exception.
The photo in question was a full-frontal nude of an exotic dancer performing in MacEwan Student Centre on Mon., Feb. 28. Her real name was not used, her face was covered, and the photos were taken at the request of the event organizer--we broke no laws by running it.
Reaction to this photo has ranged from disgust to endorsement, but the vast majority of people I've talked to are indifferent.
The photo along with the story accurately depicted the nature of the Students' Union's controversial Sexual Health Awareness Show. The event's purpose was to raise sexual awareness in the student body and the SU decided to do so by showing unlicensed adult entertainment.
Throughout that day, the SU received complaints from students, parents and Campus Security about performers walking through the crowded MSC Food Court wearing nothing more than what was depicted in the photo.
In spite of these complaints, the SU allowed these performers to go on stage on Monday evening in even more revealing outfits in promotion of sexual health awareness.
The Gauntlet was invited to cover and photograph an event obviously meant to shock people with its alternative sexual theme.
The show did shock the university, and I covered it in the same fashion it was conducted. To do any different would be an inaccurate representation of an event on campus. If there is one place in society that should be censorship free, it is the university environment.
These performers are not victims, they walked into this with their eyes wide open. The performers were hired by the SU to put on the show, they chose their own outfits and performed in a public environment, in front of both media and the university population. Had this been a private event with people unaware of what they were doing we wouldn't have run the photo we did.
We should be celebrating the freedoms we have in university, not repressing them. The SU tried to raise sexual awareness on campus and, in doing so, found how sorely needed it was.
I didn't try and shock you by allowing these women to walk around naked, the SU did. I merely reported it, and brought the controversy to the larger student population.






Comments
I don't think anybody knew who she was - until today. And she thinks the Gauntlet is responsible?
University teaches a mind to think, adapat, and expand. Just look at how this story has begun to snowball. Then again, this could be PR to boost tips to pay for graduate studies! There is a definate philosophy at work here, but does it really have anything to do with morals.
Final thought, should all the people that paid (in the bar) to see Honey naked be offering her an apology as well?
my 2 cents
-Anonymous Coward
I believe that you are missing a very important point. When Ms. Houston was inside the Sexual Awarness Week and when she strips, she participates because she is in a place where only people that want to see her can see her. In the Gauntlet she is seen by a lot of people that don't want to see her and because of that school becomes an unwelcome atmosphere for her.
I agree completely. But she wasnt only inside the sexual awareness week area. She was spanking some guys ass in the middle of the food court wearing her 'chain mail'.
I didnt 'want to see her' - she brought her show to me. And what I saw in the Gauntlet was what I saw in the food court.
My mom called me and told me about this. Rather hilarious, hearing about it way over here, from my mom.
I'm confused tho: Did you run the naked chick on the cover? Or inside?
Is the U of C getting more and more prudish? Look up the Sex Supplement from a few years back... Way nastier pictures in there.
And, has Harvey Weingarten called yet, to express his disapointment? I hope so. He did with the contorted cock on the cover, I'd hate to think he was a hypocrite, or something...
-Nicole
Not everyone wants to see naked men at women when they're trying to eat lunch why include it in the gauntlet? I wonder if you would have been so quick to print a naked male?
A couple years ago they printed a pic of "puppetry of the penis" - two males playing with their penises and making them look like hamburgers.
I think they made the news for that one too.
I am deeply disturbed to hear that the Gauntlet's board ignored literally quite a pile of evidence against their assumptions in order to charge, try, convict, and sentence two of its own editors without notice, and in absentia no less.
To the affected editors: Please do not dignify this board's travesty of justice that festers so violently with delusions of reality.
Unfortunately, the only two people at the paper who were looking into an apology were impeached by your SU VP Op-Fi on Monday. Good going.
Impressive use of the English language here, its a shame that it doesnÃt mean anything but never mind. I myself am surprised that it came to an impeachment, but as Bryan West said it would have taken a simple apology from the Gauntlet staff in order to avoid all of this. As I noted above the actions of both parties in this case were reprehensible. But for the Gauntlet to place the blame solely on the SU and Ms. Huston was incredibly immature especially for a paper that represents a institution that promotes higher learning. With respect to the male vs. female nudity issue, the difference between the puppetry of the Penis skit three years ago in comparison to this is, the actors in that skit were fully aware of the coverage that they were receiving from the Gauntlet, where as Ms. Huston was not. This is not equality or a free speech issue. This is the life of a young women which has been negatively affected by an article whose primary focus was to raise the profile of the Gauntlet.
The point of a newspaper is to cover this type of event and inform the people who did not attend, such as myself. The Gauntlet should not have to apologise for covering this news-worthy event. In fact, if I were the stripper, I would be thanking the Gauntlet for not publishing my face! That was not something they had to do as she in no way tried to protect her own anonymity.
In the end, the event accomplished what it set out to do, it brought sexual awareness to campus, sort of. I am confused as to why this girl would be okay with garneshing attention in person for this event but not from the media.
Money money money, moneeeey
http://www.canada.com/calgary/calgaryherald/news/city/story.html?id=d643f440-4e07-4085-a52c-3b5f4f9f8cdf&page=1
hope links work in these forums.
-Dougie
Honey said that school was the only place where she was judged by her intelligence, not her body, but I guess she screwed that up when she agreed to do the show and wear nothing but a chain link bikini - there are other sexy outfits that can be worn that leave a little to the imagination and would still increase sexual awareness.
This was HER choice, she made it, she has to deal with it. I do not agree with censoring the Gauntlet; however, maybe photographers should okay their pics with the people in them before they are published.